Remembering 9-11-01.
We will not forget!

 

 


Illinois   RSS
Photos of Illinois Police Units
       
    
Anonymous wrote: Friday, September 29, 2006 - 18:42

Yes some officer still have to drive the caprices, but i have only seen guys in our TRU unit (target response unit) driving them.

Guest Ken M. wrote: Friday, August 11, 2006 - 18:50

Re: Departments who's cars/uniforms/patches etc. are to appear on screen are given a copy of the script, if it meets their approval, they'll let the production company use it. If not, fictional cities or genaricly marked cars are used. An example is Minneapolis, MN P.D. They have trademarked their graphics and patches and any use must be approved from the city. Some departments may not allow the use of thier equipment, but will let production companies duplicate the cars that are supplied by the production company. Hope this answeres your question.

Guest jw wrote: Friday, August 11, 2006 - 17:50

There are a handful of these still in service at 11 years old and well in excess of 200,000k on the odometer.

Guest EMT Y wrote: Friday, August 11, 2006 - 11:48

Cool picture, alot of the older caprices are still in service in the Phoenix area along with the newer cars.

 copcar dot comUnited States wrote: Friday, August 11, 2006 - 9:23

You can answer your own question about when the photo was taken by clicking on the EXIF details to the right of the photo:

Captured with: Canon EOS 30D
Exif Image Details


Guest IL Paramedic wrote: Friday, August 11, 2006 - 9:11

It could be....our state police fleet is in terrible shape!

Anonymous wrote: Thursday, August 10, 2006 - 19:55

When was this picture taken? Is this vehicle still on service?

Guest paul reznicek wrote: Monday, August 7, 2006 - 15:38

I can't believe people aren't making comments about you Anonym-ass. It's one of many pieces of equipment used by the PD. So sit back, shut the hell up and enjoy the show. Jeeeeez!

It's no wonder why Greg deleted the comments option from his folders.

Anonymous wrote: Monday, August 7, 2006 - 13:20

Why dont you build one yourself?? it will be a lot cheaper and you can get the high school auto shop to work on the body and put a base coat of paint on.

Anonymous wrote: Monday, August 7, 2006 - 13:18

Thats because this is a Ford

Anonymous wrote: Monday, August 7, 2006 - 13:01

ive never seen a chevy in that color before. far out!!

Anonymous wrote: Saturday, July 22, 2006 - 23:12

This truck is old they need new one but it looks cool. Nice good strong metal bumper. I like the color of the P.D. car Blue is my favorite color

Anonymous wrote: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 - 8:46

I hear that some police officers are still driving 1993-1996 Chevy Caprices, despite of higher milleages. Is that true?

Anonymous wrote: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 - 11:11

This is a very nice photo, and it does look like a set-up for an ad. Great shot Dave.

And FYI Anon, "The Fugitive" was made in 1993, this is a 98 or 99 CVPI.

Guest rick wrote: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - 18:08

MP has always had nice black and whites, but these are the best squads I have ever seen.

Guest Officer Friendly wrote: Friday, March 24, 2006 - 13:26

Strange seeing a Chevrolet Caprice equiped with mid 80's Ford LTD Hubcaps.

Anonymous wrote: Thursday, March 2, 2006 - 17:07

At least Tater and jw are on the same page on this one.

Guest etg wrote: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 - 14:55

"I think you should take Tater's advise"

...

really? i honestly think it would be better if the toothless banjo player would take his advice, not his "advise."

Guest jw wrote: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 - 14:42

I don't see anything that unusual about it considering the era it was taken in. What makes it "Halerious"? I think you should take Tater's advise.

Guest Buddy Roe Smith wrote: Sunday, January 29, 2006 - 10:54

This might be a halerious picture!!!


copcar dot com, Copyright © 1998-2006, Dave Arnold. All rights reserved. The photographs, graphics and data contained in this Web site are the properties of the contributors, Dave Arnold or copcar dot com and may not be used without expressed written consent.